About Me

My photo
Brutal Antipathy is a pseudonym for a blogger and forum debate enthusiast whose views often rest well outside of social baseline. A self confirmed atheist, misanthropist, and sadist, his commentary ranges from parched textbook facts to satire and sarcasm. He is a proponent of free speech and individual liberty even when these are taken to excess. His political views shift between lower case libertarian and enlightened despotism depending on the level of contempt he is feeling for his fellow humans at any given moment. His reading interests include history, general science, archaeology, comparative religion, psychology, & sociology. Other interests and hobbies include practicing various crafts, torturing his slave, blogging, playing with his dogs, collecting antiques, role playing & tactical simulation games, renaissance fairs, and cheerfully making other people miserable by holding up a mirror of their shortcomings and repeatedly bashing them in the face with it. L is the owned slave of BA. She basically has the same interests and views as her owner except in music.

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Further Feminist Fun

I love South Park. Creators Parker & Stone gleefully defecate on hundreds of subjects in a deliciously dark, satirical style. While their humor usually carries them far over the top, they have an uncanny ability to hit the nail on the head.

Your Typical Radical Feminist

And so it is with the minor character Ms. Choksondik.  Ms. Choksondik is portrayed as an unattractive, overweight, sagging breasted, sexually repressed teacher. In season 5 episode 7 Proper Condom Use, Choksondik embodies the spirit of radical feminism quite eloquently. While teaching a sexual education class to the girls, she employs graphic scare tactics and wildly distorted facts concerning STD's and pregnancy to frighten them away from sex. This is where the hammer strikes the nail, as the portrayal of Choksondik's fear & loathing of sex is a window straight into the soul of radical feminism.

You see, just as with our tantrum tossing subby that can't have what she wants, the feminazis drip cognitive dissonance like a Tijuana hooker's snatch drips sperm, only on a far grander scale. These women are obsessed with cock, especially in their cobweb laden cootches. They have elevated, deified, and vilified the penis to epic levels. Just as the Japanese took the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and transformed this into the walking embodiment of nuclear fury, Godzilla, the feminazis have taken the penis and transformed it into the Mighty Penis.

People Seduced by Feminism Will See a Penis in this Innocent Photo of a Chinese Paper Dragon

The relation between the feminazi and Ms. Choksondik should be obvious. Choksondik is rather homely, causing men to have never paid her any attention. Because her normal desire for love and intercourse was denied her, Choksondik has began convincing herself that sex is dirty, disgusting, and disease ridden. This is a light version of radical feminism.

Radical feminists have taken the Mighty Penis through the roof. Like Choksondik, the average Radfem is downright repulsive. These are women that couldn't get dick if it were handed out like government cheese at a welfare line. These crusty crotched counter-cocksters emit a magnetic repulsion to the skin flute. Dicks have been known to recede into the bellies of their man-pals rather than point the way south like the cunt compasses nature designed them for when encountering these rancid Radfems. Cucumbers wilt, dildos droop,  broomsticks bend. You get the point that they cannot get the point.

Just what then is the crabby cock craver to do when she cannot obtain the phallus of her affection? She begins telling herself that she doesn't really want it anyway. Pricks are nasty. Women are better off without them.

Then things turn ugly. The man-meat craving dick hounds feast upon the nasty swill, then regurgitate it as even more repulsive rhetoric. All this cock talk naturally makes them again begin to drool over the fantasy of a throbbing cock hammering them until both crotches are black & blue. Now they need to stifle those thoughts, so they chat for hours about the evils of having their pussies pounded; how dirty it is, how it will give them urinary tract infections, how it will make them pregnant, how it is so patriarchal. Never mind that genital sex is the way nature made us able to reproduce. Out with Mother Nature, and in with Father Nature, as only a disgusting male would have made sex such an ugly, violent, invasive thing!

You can guess what happens next. In all their feminalysis of the Mighty Penis, it is now constantly on their minds. They see the Mighty Penis everywhere. Cars, buses, trains, planes, skyscrapers, credit cards, diamonds, carrots, salami, mushrooms, everything becomes the embodiment of the Mighty Penis. The harder they fight against it, the more it is thrust into their faces. The Mighty Penis has become all they can think and speak of. They have to escape somehow from the rigid, throbbing, dew tipped evil images in their heads. They have to repress these wicked, woman enslaving thoughts that had to have been placed there by some fiendish male conspiracy and not possibly from their unending contemplation of cock.

They attempt just this by removing the mention of penis from their vocabulary. They avoid even talking about the sexual act. But even then, they cannot get the thought of pussy pounding out of their heads. Their talk actively avoids mentioning that which they covet. In their frustrated efforts to purge the Mighty Penis from their every waking and sleeping thought, they eliminate the 'man' in woman by spelling it womyn. They refuse to spell out their repressed desires by reducing their dialog to anagrams such as PIV, short for Penis in Vagina. As you see, they have still failed in their escape from the Mighty Penis and the root of all their problems, as PIV comes to dominate virtually every feminazi discussion.

There is only one escape. As the fugly feminazis cannot ever obtain the object of their infatuation, and as they can never purge the Mighty Penis from their minds, they must eradicate the Mighty Penis. This way, since they can't have it, neither can any of those other women.

My Point Exactly, Thanks.

Thus begins the campaign to convince all women of the evils of the Mighty Penis. Sex is Patriarchal, and to be avoided. Sex is rape. Rapes are happening a thousand times a second, every second of every day. If you are having sex, you are being raped, even if you don't know it, because the Mighty Penis has brainwashed you into doing it. Rape Culture is all around you, and yet another of the myriad tools used by the Mighty Penis to enslave you. Don't go outside, because the Mighty Penis will get you. Don't drive, because the Mighty Penis is going to slam into you. Every interaction with a male, no matter how mundane, is an attempt for the Mighty Penis to pummel you. You will never be safe until we have neutered the Mighty Penis.

Think that I am kidding? You should know me better than that by now. Feminazis have various Final Solutions out there for men.The provided link is but one. Here is a little nugget of nut numbing hate speech from there:

"4. Our Emphasis on Fundamental Change.  We have moved beyond palliation (negotiation, mediation, reform, compromise, engagement with the System) to exploring effective means of extirpating male pathology, including being open to biological explanations and treatment of such psychopathy. We are concerned with the overall structure of male oppression. We are open to going wherever the evidence and experience lead us.

In recent years, studies of male hormones and aggression, the development of the science of social dominance theory, primate studies, and genetics have begun in my opinion to take us very close to the etiology of the underlying sickness. This emphasis on looking at the pathology of male hormonal mechanisms is a new kind of “essentialism” that offers hope, because treatments can be developed to mitigate the death-drive of men, their hierarchical psychology, their insensitivity to the pain of living creatures, their pleasure in violence and intimidation, their acquisitiveness, their rape and phallic obsessions. It’s an exciting development, though the science involved it goes hand in hand with new dangers to women which must be resisted."

You read it right, buckos. They are suggesting that maleness be genetically engineered out of men. Now, do you really want to argue that there is not some serious cock craving and cognitive dissonance going on here? Two words, you meat minded menstruating misandrists, Cognitive Dissonance! Your frothing at the mouth anti-male spiel exposes your actions for what they really are, cock hungry whores that are bitter because they can't score tube steak. 

I know where you would like to go with this. "Not all feminists are like that." you say, "Most feminists only want equality.". If only this were the case, I would support feminism wholeheartedly. Unfortunately though, mainstream feminism has been inundated with Radfem dogma, and as such continues to perpetuate the Radfem lies like only 2% of all rape accusations are false, just as they continue to scream out the intentionally loaded language charged "rape culture" meme in order to inspire fear. Manstream feminists are sock puppets with the hand of the radical feminists up their asses. Were this not the case, were moderate feminists really interested in non-Gynocracy, they would be taking a stand on other issues than their own.

Instead what we see is their continual perpetration of the myth of their being unequal, even though laws are in effect that grant them equal rights, and in cases of reproduction, child custody,  and rape, even more rights than men. Even moderate feminists demonstrate their Gyno-agenda through selective reading. For example, the National Organization for Women recently decried Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia's admittedly disturbing interpretation of the 14th Amendment because he basically said that it did not offer the protections we think it does. Their commentary taken from the NOW website  reads as follows:

"Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia recently declared that he believes the Constitution does not prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, even though the Fourteenth Amendment states: "nor shall any State deprive any person of the equal protection of the laws" (emphasis added) In Scalia's world, women are not persons. Although this radical erasure of half the population from the concept of "person" is a minority view, the fact that Scalia is one of only nine Supreme Court justices gives him outsized power over women's everyday lives. And he has used that power, repeatedly -- even passionately -- to keep women down. Ratifying the ERA will create an iron-clad guarantee that laws cannot discriminate against women" 

Can you believe that a supreme court judge said that? Well, he really did say that, and more. It is the 'and more' part that I found most interesting. Here is Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia in an interview with California Lawyer magazine where he makes the comment. I have added emphasis on the part which the feminazi's at NOW omitted. While Scalia did not spell out the emphasized part, it was definitely mentioned in the question asked him as you will see:

In 1868, when the 39th Congress was debating and ultimately proposing the 14th Amendment, I don't think anybody would have thought that equal protection applied to sex discrimination, or certainly not to sexual orientation. So does that mean that we've gone off in error by applying the 14th Amendment to both?

Yes, yes. Sorry, to tell you that. ... But, you know, if indeed the current society has come to different views, that's fine. You do not need the Constitution to reflect the wishes of the current society. Certainly the Constitution does not require discrimination on the basis of sex. The only issue is whether it prohibits it. It doesn't. Nobody ever thought that that's what it meant. Nobody ever voted for that. If the current society wants to outlaw discrimination by sex, hey we have things called legislatures, and they enact things called laws. You don't need a constitution to keep things up-to-date. All you need is a legislature and a ballot box. You don't like the death penalty anymore, that's fine. You want a right to abortion? There's nothing in the Constitution about that. But that doesn't mean you cannot prohibit it. Persuade your fellow citizens it's a good idea and pass a law. That's what democracy is all about. It's not about nine superannuated judges who have been there too long, imposing these demands on society. 

Notice that he was being asked about both female and homosexual rights,  but despite NOW claiming to be homosexual rights advocates, they completely ignore this issue and turn it instead to focus only on their agenda. Feminists do not care about equality. They want power, power, and more power.

Fact; even though a dipshit judge makes a serious faux pas, the rest of the Supreme Court has rarely seen eye to eye with Scalia. He is very much the black robed bad boy of justice, and has a long and inglorious history of taking an uberconservative stance against minority rights. I am of the personal opinion that he would fit better in white robes than black, perhaps with a cross burning in the foreground. Fortunately we have the rest of the Supreme Court to stand guard over the 14th Amendment, which does indeed grant women equality. Not that this is enough for the feminazis. They insist on a equal rights Amendment that mentions womyn. Fuck the rights of children, fuck the rights of homosexuals, fuck the rights of non  Caucasians, fuck the rights of men, just give us the rights that we already have!

And still you people support feminism. You poor PC brainwashed schmucks! It is high time to say what needs to be said. Fuck Feminism! The way to do this is to cut the head off of the snake, and that head is the Radfem movement. Eliminate them and the rest of feminism vanishes as the feminazi hand slithers from the feminists collective ass. Now this will be no easy feat. After all, no guy is going to fuck one of the rancid Radfem twats with them looking the way they do. So my proposal is to raise enough money to pay for plastic surgery & liposuction  for each of them. Once they start looking like bangable broads, then we can proceed to the porkin', once and for all actually Fucking Feminism into extinction as their cognitive dissonance evaporates in the heat of orgasm.

Until that time, I propose that we rename Feminists. As they have a poster child in Ms Choksondik, as Ms Choksondik embodies the very essence of feminism, and as Ms Choksondik's very name reads so true of the feminists, I propose that from this time forth, feminists be hereby referred to as Chokesondik's.



  1. I flipped through that hub site. Yiehhh, I wish I didn't. It was like dipping into the tub of rancid acid, which stays with you for a while.

    Don't know about "cock envy", so won't speculate, but it sure did strike me that there is a lot, and I mean A LOT, of self-loathing in that group, which is then promptly transferred to anyone-and-thing that do not share it instead of facing it for what it is.

    Perhaps I don't quite get any of it, not even the "tame feminism", due to coming from a sort of background that historically and culturally had a completely different regard for women. I admit that it may very well be the sole reason as to why they all seem so "off the wall" to me. I won't deny that just forty-fifty years ago, in "western society", women have been treated unequally, but it certainly has changed since and painting it instead as something that has, supposedly, "worsened"--is indeed what throws women everywhere into backwaters.

  2. I consider myself a feminist and I will stubbornly cling to my naive belief that feminism, the good kind, is simply a movement to empower women. Empower us from within to accept our true selves, to accept our sexuality and to embrace everything that makes us women. I think the type of feminism that puts men down in an effort to empower women is backwards and foolish and I have never supported it.

    I found both your feminist blog hilarious, but, BA I am calling you out . You use the ugly, fat, can't get laid argument way too much. It's like a crutch! Diversify man. :op

  3. @ Dina. One of the things I find wrong with Feminism is that they make women sound so downtrodden and helpless, create an atmosphere of fear, and then claim to offer a solution to these completely invented problems. My second major issue is their refusal to actually attempt to strive for true equality. For instance, when NOW was asked to support the protest of "Boys are stupid, throw rocks at them." shirts, they refused, claiming that they had bigger issues to address. And yet when a bimbo is NOT assaulted in an elevator and a man points this out, they scream that despite the bigger issues elsewhere in the world that he mentioned, this was no reason to invalidate her non issue.

    @ Brandy. If feminism were actually what you like to think it is, I would be behind it 100%, just as I would if it stood for true equality.

    And I will quit using the fat, ugly, celibate argument just as soon as Radfems stop being fat, ugly, and celibate.

  4. El burro sabe mas que tu!
    Tu eres más feo que el culo de un mono!!
    Besa mi culo!!!!
    Tu hermano no tiene la ingle
    Cagaste y saltaste en la caca
    Jode tu madre ayer noche
    Tengo ganas
    Me encanta tu culo
    Pudrete en el infierno
    Yo cago en la leche de tu puta madre!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  5. For anyone who thinks feminism isn't really that bad and it's only the radical extreme left, lesbian sepratists who think like this, i'd suggest checking out girlwriteswhat at youtube. A very intelligent woman who speaks on what is really going on with feminism today.

    i'm horrified to think that maleness has been devolved into some kind of genetic sickness that needs to be eradicated. Don't they have fathers or brothers in their lives who they care for?