 |
| Fetlife Welcoming Committee |
Almost universally the undertops come to the planetary defense of their massive mammary macrocosms, insisting that they "like a little meat on the bone." Really? Fucking shame that fat isn't meat, isn't it? No, my malnourished manservant's, I have checked, and the majority of men indeed do not favor the bloated bondage bitch. A recent study in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology indicates that, and I quote "Men's judgments of women's attractiveness were based primarily around physical features and they rated highly those who looked thin and seductive." A separate study conducted in Australia and Hong Kong published in the Journal of Evolutionary Biology showed that there was a strong level of agreement between the 4 groups of Australian men and women, and Hong Kong men and women, with scans of younger, taller and lighter women being rated as more attractive. Women with narrow waists, especially relative to their height, were also considered much more attractive. So avoiding culture and gender bias, we still learn what we already knew...fat+ugly=Fugly. In light of this, I do not for one second believe than 9 out of 10 weekend ass slapping males actually prefer porkers.
 |
| Some Pictures Are Worth A Thousand Words |
Have some pride, people. Tell your lazy bitch of a sub to put down the bonbons, turn off Oprah, lift her blubber up off the couch, and go run on a treadmill. She isn't attractive, she isn't healthy, she looks like reheated vomit when you post pictures and videos of her sagging tits, ass, and cankles on the internet, and you are showing the world what an ineffective 'master' you are by letting the bitch be seen in public. Do yourself, her, and the aesthetics of the world a favor and keep the all consuming catastrophe indoors and off camera until she has shed 226.796 kilograms (that is 500 pounds in real numbers) and get her diabetic ass on Nutrisystem.
You are dooming yourself to bad karma. Next life you will probably end up one of those lap dogs permanently crushed by a large lady. The very last thing you will see will be a huge, polyester covered ass coming straight down at you!
ReplyDeleteI would rather come back as a behemoth crushed dog than a Twinkie at Paddles.
ReplyDelete-BA
Always have loved the line: "But I'm big boned." Funny, I have never seen a fat skeleton before, have you?
ReplyDelete-L
Still stickin it to the fatties you brutal SOB. If you write it they will come and here I am. How the fuck are you 2 doin? Missed reading your journal on CM and saw the link for the new and improved one, so I came a runnin. Had to join in order to follow. Lookin forward to your sickness
ReplyDeleteMike
Hi Mike,
ReplyDeleteI don't think the weight thing would bother me so much if the supposed dominants didn't go to such ridiculous lengths to justify it. Of course I should probably thank them for giving me a target to shoot at, albeit a very wide target.
Glad to see you reading, but as you are familiar with my writings, you will doubtless remember how sporadic I can be. Hope I keep you entertained.
God I hope my Master never lets me get like that.
ReplyDeleteHi Agnes,
ReplyDeleteIf he does, have him drop me a line and I can go over an entertaining weight loss idea of mine that involves a stationary bike, metal plugs, and a violet wand.
The Obesity Paradox
ReplyDeleteSeptember 6, 2012 (Gothenburg, Sweden) — Further support for the concept of the obesity paradox has come from a large study of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) [1]. Those who were deemed overweight or obese by body-mass index (BMI) had a lower risk of death after PCI than normal-weight or underweight participants up to three years after hospitalization, report Dr Oskar Angerås (University of Gothenburg, Sweden) and colleagues in their paper, published online September 5, 2012 in the European Heart Journal.
The underweight group (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2) had the greatest risk for mortality. Medical therapy and PCI-treated patients with modest overweight (BMI 26.5 kg/m2 to < 28
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/761402
according to an analysis of >80 000 cases entered into the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) ICD records in 2010 and 2011 [1].
It may be that underweight isn't getting the attention as a risk factor that it deserves, according to Hsu. "A lot of our efforts have concentrated on obese patients because we know they're at risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, but maybe it takes away from focusing our attention on [other] patients who can certainly be at risk for complications and adverse events at procedures like ICD implantation. Maybe we do need to focus more attention on the underweight population that's clearly at risk."
A recent proposal is that heart rate is a more accurate indicator of cardiovascular risk (more than 70 bpm) than cholesterol, BMI, or blood pressure.
ReplyDeleteGreat observations by the Swedes there, or it would be if the data weren't flawed. Weird how they excluded people who were in a hospital or nursing home, isn't it? What a perfect way to cover up the wealth of death rates of the morbidly obese elderly who make up the majority of heart attack and stroke death. More careful and professional research has identified specific areas of concentrated body fat, in specific fat concentrated at the waist, to be a better indicator of overall health than the BMI. Nevertheless, you would be hard pressed to find a doctor who encourages you to remain morbidly obese-even in Sweden. Being overweight always increases your risk of heart disease, always. Don't believe me? Call a Swedish doctor and ask!
ReplyDeletePorkers can continue to believe the Big Fat Lie of the Obesity Paradox if they want. That just means they will die sooner and stop being nauseating eyesores. All it really means to me is that their owners are too ignorant to do the research.
Yes, it is true that elevated heart rate is an indicator. Also true that when you are carrying a half ton of blubber around, your heart rate is going to jump up a few-or 20-beats. When one arm weighs 80 pounds, you are probably going to his the triple digit bpm reaching for that cheese danish on the coffee table. And while we can admit that cholesterol is not the primary cause of cardiovascular disease, it does remain one of the top 5 causes. And what is a major cause of elevated cholesterol levels? Why obesity is!
Every sentence in this was beautiful. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteThe obesity paradox is called a paradox because it IS a paradox. It defies conventional wisdom and our comfort levels and UCSF is leading the studies which are proving it more and more. However- the title is misleading because it isn't obesity- it is normal weight and what is classified as overweight. When it reaches actual obesity the trend goes back to the same as underweight. Neither are healthy.
ReplyDelete@ nothing. You seem to have missed the mention of FLAWED DATA GATHERING, so I thought I should repeat it with the capslock on. Let me put it simply for you. There IS NO PARADOX. The ALLEGED PARADOX was the RESULT OF FLAWED DATA COLLECTING which failed to include the very people whose obesity would have been the most telling. The data also does NOT suggest that the obese are equally as unhealthy as those who are underweight. While both are unhealthy, their health is affected differently by their weight or lack thereof, and therefore the two cannot be compared. Bulimia does not put one in the 'same' risk category no more than radiation poisoning is in the 'same' risk category as HIV.
ReplyDeleteThis is awesome. I've noticed that the only chicks at a Fet event I would fuck are half my age so here's the mathematical expression for predicting the weight of a girl who's into BDSM at age 21. Wf=w+d*4, where Wf is weight at any age on Fet, w is weight at age 21, d is the current age minus 21. So, a 120 lb freak just graduating as a theatre major will at age 40, while a member of Fet, pounding the craft beer and cupcakes at the slosh or munch will weigh around 196 lbs.
ReplyDeleteSo you proved obese women are not popular with men? Yawn... Anyone ever tell you you're not as clever as you think you are?
ReplyDeleteHi, Unknown.
DeleteActually, I didn't prove anything. As my post mentioned, that data was obtained from journals on biology and psychology. Reality, not me, gets the credit.
So I guess reality isn't as clever as we thought it was.